by norfolkandchance » Sat Aug 25, 2012 3:07 pm
Hi.I have recently had just such a conversation with someone who didn't know they had HMS until I 'did the tests' on them!
She had an absolutely horrendous experience with her first child and so is considering requesting c-section for her next. I explained all the pros and cons between a vaginal birth and a surgical one but ultimately, it really comes down to individual choice and the decision whether or not more children are desired later.
HMS is a syndrome, not a disease. As such, it affects people in so many different ways, it is impossible to predict how one person will react to another person's experiences. For me, my c-section was utter hell and misery. For someone else I know who is also HMS, it was their godsend.
I am unfortunate in that my labours go on for hours and hours! But when it comes to pushing the baby out, it happens very quickly - about five minutes the last time I think (with a 9lb odd baby). My c-section resulted in inadequate analgesia and a very long, infection-complicated, painful recovery.
I know I heal badly. Therefore, for me, I avoid all things that increase healing requirements. Other people heal well. For them, it is a different kind of choice.
My tuppence worth is: Go for a natural, totally intervention-free vaginal birth (ie don't get induced, augmented or generally fiddled about with) if you want more children. As already mentioned, there are potentially serious anaesthetic issues regarding operations and HMS but quite apart from that, having a scar on your uterus can adversely affect fertility and future child-bearing events.
I'm happy to chat privately in more detail with anyone if you wish. (I have more than a passing interest in all matters obstetric!)