by AnnaH » Sat May 19, 2012 7:28 pm
Rosie,
thats interesting about HMS generally getting better with age, because of course my experience has been the exact opposite. I am now far more disabled by HMS than I ever was when I was younger, and my joints have become much more unstable. Although I am very stiff as well, in some joints. I can still put my palms on the floor with straight legs, however.
But in my case, I'd say when I was younger I was just hypermobile, and accident-prone, but it didn't really cause me severe, chronic problems. Now days, I have the full-blown syndrome, damaged Achilles, damaged feet, arthritic hands, a dodgy shoulder, plus all the internal problems which haven't improved with age (in fact things like prolapses generally worsen as women get older). Then again, apparently I'm not a straight forward EDS-H, I've got traits of other, much rarer forms instead (although Donna tells me that's not that unusual for HMS people either). We had assumed we all got it from my grandfather's side, but I've just found out my grandmother had POTS, so maybe we got it from both sides?
Re. the genetic tests: my friend's child is suspected to have the Classical form of EDS, with the mega-stretchy skin, and we've been told there isn't a genetic test for that either. So it seems there is only a genetic test for vascular EDS and Marfans (which he certainly hasn't got, being tiny for his age). I'm not quite sure how they'd diagnose Classical EDS, or how they'd distinguish it from HMS/ EDS-H, or whether it's even relevant to worry about the label.
It seems to me that the problem is uneducated doctors and physios, whatever you call it. If we can teach them about the condition, the joint problems as well as the internal problems, then maybe things would improve for us all, whatever of the Hypermobility Syndromes we have.